Metric Explainer: EBITDA
How much money the core business operations generate, before accounting for depreciation, interest on loans, and taxes. "EBITDA batata hai ki company ka actu...
Back to metrics
Simple definition
How much money the core business operations generate, before accounting for depreciation, interest on loans, and taxes.
🗣️
"EBITDA batata hai ki company ka actual dhanda kitna kamaata hai — bina interest, tax, aur depreciation ko count kiye."
Why it matters
- Best proxy for operating cash generation — strips out accounting choices and capital structure
- Capital structure neutral — ignores how the business is funded (debt vs equity)
- Used in EV/EBITDA — the most popular valuation multiple globally
- Comparable across companies — not distorted by different depreciation policies or tax rates
Formula
EBITDA = Revenue − Operating Expenses (excl. D&A)
OR (bottom-up):
EBITDA = PAT + Tax + Interest + Depreciation & Amortisation
How to calculate (step by step)
| Step | Source | Example (TCS) |
|---|---|---|
| 1. PAT | P&L bottom line | ₹42,000 Cr |
| 2. + Income Tax | P&L | ₹14,500 Cr |
| 3. + Interest/Finance costs | P&L | ₹500 Cr |
| 4. + Depreciation & Amortisation | P&L | ₹5,000 Cr |
| 5. EBITDA | Sum of above | ₹62,000 Cr |
EBITDA vs Operating Profit (EBIT)
Revenue
Gross Profit
EBITDA
minus D&AEBIT / Operating Profit
minus InterestPBT
minus TaxPAT
| Metric | Includes D&A? | Includes Interest? | Includes Tax? |
|---|---|---|---|
| EBITDA | No | No | No |
| EBIT | Yes | No | No |
| PBT | Yes | Yes | No |
| PAT | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Sector context
| Sector | Typical EBITDA Margin | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| IT Services | 25–30% | People-cost heavy |
| FMCG | 20–28% | Brand + distribution advantage |
| Pharma | 20–30% | R&D costs are the swing factor |
| Auto OEM | 10–15% | Capital-intensive, competitive |
| Steel | 12–25% | Highly cyclical with commodity prices |
| Telecom | 35–50% | High fixed costs, high margins |
Common mistakes
Mistakes to avoid
- Treating EBITDA as cash flow — EBITDA ignores capex, working capital changes, and tax. It overstates actual cash for capital-heavy businesses
- "EBITDA is not a GAAP/IndAS metric" — It's calculated, not reported. Different companies may calculate it differently (especially around Other Income)
- Adjusted EBITDA abuse — Companies sometimes add back stock compensation, restructuring costs, and other items to inflate "adjusted EBITDA"
- Ignoring lease costs — Under IndAS 116, lease costs are reclassified from opex to D&A + interest, inflating EBITDA
Real example: Why EBITDA beats PAT for comparison
| Metric | Company A (Debt-free) | Company B (Leveraged) |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹1,000 Cr | ₹1,000 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹200 Cr | ₹200 Cr |
| Interest | ₹0 | ₹80 Cr |
| PAT | ₹145 Cr | ₹85 Cr |
Both companies have identical operating performance (same EBITDA). Company B looks worse on PAT only because it chose debt financing. EBITDA reveals they're equally good operators.
Red flags
- Negative EBITDA — the core business is losing money before even D&A and interest
- Large gap between EBITDA and CFO — working capital may be consuming cash
- EBITDA growing but PAT declining — interest costs or depreciation eating into profits
- "Adjusted EBITDA" significantly higher than reported — check what's being excluded
Related metrics
- EBITDA Margin — EBITDA as % of revenue
- EBIT — EBITDA minus depreciation
- EV/EBITDA — Key valuation multiple using this metric
- CFO — The actual cash version of EBITDA
